Evaluation of a Modified Fly Grill for Fly-Density Surveillance Practicum

Main Article Content

Siti Noor Ain Afifah Puteri
M. Rizki Imanuddin
Adiansyah Adiansyah
Muhammad Pahruddin

Abstract

Conventional Fly Grills are simple and useful tools for fly-density surveillance; however, their size, weight, and storage requirements may limit repeated use during field practicum. A foldable and rollable Fly Grill model was developed to improve portability while maintaining its core measurement function. This study aimed to evaluate student acceptance of the modified Fly Grill as a practical learning tool. A descriptive evaluative cross-sectional survey was conducted among fourth-semester students of the Department of Environmental Health, Poltekkes Kemenkes Banjarmasin, following direct use of six modified Fly Grill units during practicum. Ninety-five valid respondents completed a 33-item, four-point Likert-scale questionnaire covering ease of use, portability, comfort, and general perception. Data were analyzed descriptively using frequencies, means, and standard deviations. The modified Fly Grill received highly favorable ratings across all domains, with mean scores of 3.72±0.40 for ease of use, 3.68±0.42 for general perception, 3.65±0.45 for portability, and 3.64±0.45 for comfort. The highest item-level scores were observed for ease of understanding the instructions and relocating the device (both 3.77±0.45), followed by ease of setup (3.75±0.44). Lower ratings were found for device weight (3.61±0.49), handle/structural comfort and stability (both 3.62±0.51), and user safety (3.63±0.49), although all remained positive. The modified Fly Grill demonstrated high student acceptance and potential as a portable and reusable practicum tool. However, this study evaluated perceptions and acceptance only; technical performance, durability, and learning outcomes were not assessed. Further comparative studies using objective measures are recommended.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Monyama MC, Onyiche ET, Taioe MO, Nkhebenyane JS, Thekisoe OMM. Bacterial pathogens identified from houseflies in different human and animal settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Med Sci. 2022;8(2):827–44. doi:10.1002/vms3.496 PubMed PMID: 33955703.

Khamesipour F, Lankarani KB, Honarvar B, Kwenti TE. A systematic review of human pathogens carried by the housefly (Musca domestica L.). BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1049):1–15. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5934-3.

Sudagidan M, Ozalp VC, Can Ö, Eligül H, Yurt MNZ, Tasbasi BB, et al. Surface microbiota and associated staphylococci of houseflies (Musca domestica) collected from different environmental sources. Microb Pathog. 2022;164:105439. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105439 PubMed PMID: 35139420.

Sobur MA, Islam MS, Haque ZF, Orubu ESF, Toniolo A, Choudhury MA, et al. Higher seasonal temperature enhances the occurrence of methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in house flies (Musca domestica) under hospital and environmental settings. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2022;67(1):109–19. doi:10.1007/s12223-021-00922-9 PubMed PMID: 34569031.

Hinkle NC, Hogsette JA. A Review of Alternative Controls for House Flies. Insects. 2021;12(11). doi:10.3390/INSECTS12111042.

Raele DA, Stoffolano JG, Vasco I, Pennuzzi G, La Porta MCN, Cafiero MA. Study on the role of the common house fly, musca domestica, in the spread of orf virus (Poxviridae) dna under laboratory conditions. Microorganisms. 2021;9(11). doi:10.3390/microorganisms9112185.

Brewer N, McKenzie MS, Melkonjan N, Zaky M, Vik R, Stoffolano JG, et al. Persistence and Significance of Chlamydia trachomatis in the Housefly, Musca domestica L. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2021;21(11):854–63. doi:10.1089/vbz.2021.0021 PubMed PMID: 34520263.

Mulasari SA, Thamarina DI. Variasi Warna Fly Grill Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepadatan Lalat Rumah (Musca domestica). JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN: Jurnal dan Aplikasi Teknik Kesehatan Lingkungan. 2022;19(2):219–26. doi:10.31964/jkl.v19i2.486.

Emerty VY, Mulasari SA. Pengaruh Variasi Warna Pada Fly Grill Terhadap Kepadatan Lalat (Studi di Rumah Pemotongan Ayam Pasar Terban Kota Yogyakarta). Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia. 2020;19(1):21. doi:10.14710/jkli.19.1.21-26.

Nurfadhilah S, Rahmawati A, Sutangi S. Pengaruh Variasi Warna Kuning pada Fly grill terhadap Kepadatan Lalat di Pasar Daerah Indramayu Tahun 2024. Afiasi : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2024;9(3):195–201. doi:10.31943/afiasi.v9i3.401.

Wulandari D, Saraswati L, Martini M. Pengaruh Variasi Warna Kuning Pada Fly Grill Terhadap Kepadatan Lalat (Studi Di Tempat Pelelangan Ikan Tambak Lorok Kota Semarang) Effect of Variation the Color Yellow on Fly Grill To Density of Flies (Study At Fish Ouction Place Tambak Lorok Semarang). Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (e-Journal). 2017;3(3):130–40. doi:10.14710/jkm.v3i3.12134

Andini T, Siregar SD, Siagian M. Efektivitas teknologi fly grill modifikasi untuk mengurangi kepadatan lalat di tempat penjualan daging di pasar sukaramai kota medan. Jurnal Kesehatan Global. 2019;2(2):54–62. doi:10.33085/jkg.v2i2.4265

Puteri SNA, Mulyaningsih B, Adiansyah. Development and Field Evaluation of a Foldable Flygrill Model for Housefly (Musca domestica) Density Surveillance. Global Health and Environmental Perspectives. 2023;444–50. doi:10.61848/ghep.v2i3.165

Heny Sasmita. Edukasi Pengendalian Lalat dan Penerapan Alat Fly Grill sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Penyakit Foodborne di Kantin UNMA Banten. Kolaborasi : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Kolaborasi Pengabdian Masyarakat. 2023;1(4):08–15. doi:10.62383/kolaborasi.v1i4.593

Rohles B, Backes S, Fischbach A, Amadieu F, Koenig V. Creating positive learning experiences with technology: A field study on the effects of user experience for digital concept mapping. Heliyon. 2022;8(4). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09246

Lim CW, Liew KY, Lim SH, Cheema MS, Sulaiman PS, Harith HH, et al. Student acceptance towards AsepticTech VR: a teaching and learning tool for cell and tissue culture aseptic techniques. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2024;21(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00472-3

Hong G, Hung CC, Mayanagi G, Nishioka T, Sun L, Lai EHH, et al. Questionnaire survey on the satisfaction of SimEx dental education system. J Dent Sci. 2023;18(2):840–7. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2023.01.028

Chen DP, Chang SW, Burgess A, Tang B, Tsao KC, Shen CR, et al. Exploration of the external and internal factors that affected learning effectiveness for the students: a questionnaire survey. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04035-4 PubMed PMID: 36690973.

Toy S, Daly Guris RJ. How to conduct survey-based research. Anaesthesia. 2023;78(7):902–5. doi:10.1111/anae.15943 PubMed PMID: 36515113.

Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research. 2021;30(8):2197–218. doi:10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4 PubMed PMID: 33818733.

Elangovan N, Sundaravel E. Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX. 2021;8(July 2020):101326. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326

Masbernat-Almenara M, Rubi-Carnacea F, Opisso E, Duarte-Oller E, Medina-Casanovas J, Valenzuela-Pascual F. Developing an assistive technology usability questionnaire for people with neurological diseases. PLoS One. 2023;18(1 January):1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0281197 PubMed PMID: 36719908.

Ostovarfar J, Soufi SK, Moosavi M, Delavari S, Moghadami M, Ghazanfari SM, et al. Clinical learning evaluation questionnaire: a reliable and valid tool for the evaluation of clinical education by educators and students. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04601-w PubMed PMID: 37644540.

Nurmala I, Nadhiroh SR, Pramukti I, Tyas LW, Zari AP, Griffiths MD, et al. Reliability and validity study of the Indonesian Smartphone Application-Based Addiction Scale (SABAS) among college students. Heliyon. 2022;8(8). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10403

Schäfer F, Quinquis L, Klein M, Escutnaire J, Chavanel F, Chevallier H, et al. Attitudes and Expectations of Clinical Research Participants Toward Digital Health and Mobile Dietary Assessment Tools: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Front Digit Health. 2022;4(March). doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.794908